Director: Ralph Bakshi
Release Date: July 10, 1992
Rating: ★★
Review:
‘Cool World’ looks like a poor man’s version of ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit‘.
Sure, the film boasts Brad Pitt and Kim Basinger as leading actors, and it even features a title song by David Bowie, but Ralph Bakshi’s product feels half-baked and derivative compared to Touchstone’s milestone film from 1988.
The film’s main problem is its story: it features a weird and obligate prologue to explain (unconvincingly) why Frank Harris (Brad Pitt) even wanders in the ‘doodle world’. Only half way we can extract this world’s core problem: ‘doodles’ and ‘noids’ (real people) cannot have sex together, because this will distort the universe. But sexy doodle ‘Holli Would’ (yes, that’s her name) would. And she does, with her own creator Jack Deebs (Gabriel Byrne).
This idea is preposterous to start with, but the execution is worse. Frank Harris, who apparently has become a cop, wanders through cardboard sets most of the time, aimless and clueless. All dialogues feel wooden and disjointed, and in several key dialogue scenes the actors clearly aren’t even together in the same room (!) with Bakshi falling back to a very unconvincing technique of suggestion of continuity of space that goes all the way back to the Keystone Comedy films of the early 1910s.
Kim Basinger acts more like a caricature of a sexy woman than being one, and the role of Jack Deebs remains vague and unclear to the very end: if he’s the creator, why did Cool World already exist in 1945, if he’s not, why is he the only one depicting it? Frank Harris somewhere suggests that more visitors are coming to this world, why then is Harris the only one allowed to stay? It just makes no sense.
The film’s main attraction, of course, is the animation. Supervised by Bruce Woodside, most of the animation is in fact is quite good (the crew even boosts a veteran animator like Bill Melendez), if completely arbitrary most of the time. Many scenes are filled with random animated scenes, mostly rather violent, sometimes grotesque, sometimes harking back to Max Fleischer, Warner Bros. or Tex Avery, at other times spoofing Disney (a cute rabbit, a hippo from Fantasia emerging from cigarette smoke, Gepetto and Pinocchio depicted in the inside of one of Holli’s ‘goons’). Being a Bakshi film, ‘Cool World’ also features a fair deal of rotoscope, most clearly so on Holli Would and Brad Pitt’s flat doodle girl friend Lorette.
Despite the high quality of the full animation, the animated scenes are mostly insane, not funny. The best attempt at humor is the finale, in which Deebs inexplicably changes into a rather pompous superhero, completely losing his former character.
Unfortunately, the scenes in which animated characters interact with humans have nothing of the sophistication of ‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’. Instead, Bakshi only deploys static scenes, a technique in existence since ‘The Three Caballeros‘, and in no scene in which ‘doodles’ and humans touch each other, one has the feeling that this is really happening.
Sadly, we must conclude that a lot of animation talent has been wasted on a meandering, clueless, badly written and badly directed film, with an immature focus on sex. The film did bad at the box office, and I’m afraid I must judge rightly so.
Watch the trailer for ‘Cool World’ yourself and tell me what you think:
‘Cool World’ is available on DVD
4 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 31, 2019 at 21:26
Roger Crownover
You it the nail right on the head in saying this is a cheap imatiion of Disneys R.R.
July 31, 2019 at 21:21
Jonathan Wilson
And it has been brought up everywhere, the film was envisioned as a straight horror film until creative differences took its toll.
But the biggest question I have for you Grob, is what film makes even less sense from a storytelling point: this or MonkeyBone?
July 31, 2019 at 21:24
Gijs Grob
That is a very good question, but until I’ve watched MonkeyBone I’m afraid I won’t be able to answer this one. What would you say?!
July 31, 2019 at 23:32
Jonathan Wilson
Well, both have the same plot beats (both focus on imature antics, both main villian toons desire to break into reality), but MonkeyBone gets more bizzare as the plot deteriorates. Though, in my view, that just makes it more enjoyable. Plus the box office was even worse.